Making Hay Monday - March 18th, 2024
High-level macro-market insights, actionable economic forecasts, and plenty of friendly candor to give you a fighting chance in the day's financial fray.
Charts of the Week
As I’ve previously observed, the amount of financial commentary devoted to the contention that market conditions don’t qualify for the “B” — as in, “Bubble” — word has been voluminous. The usual point made is that valuations aren’t as extreme as they were in early 2000. Related to this view is that stocks like NVIDIA — where the extreme price appreciation has been driven by equally, if not greater, upside earnings increases — wasn’t typically the case 24 years ago. Those arguments are sound, but they ignore the multitude of lesser-quality companies that have been caught up in this latest market moonshot. The above visual on high-momentum stocks being at an all-time high (ATH), as a percentage of the U.S. market, should cause bubble-deniers to reflect on what happened after prior readings around the 30% level.
One reason why there is such a long list of nonsensically valued stocks is that so little actual research is performed these days. As the ultra-astute Jim Bianco recently pointed out, “money management just crossed the Rubicon”. (Thanks to Luke Gromen for highlighting Jim’s post on this.) Over 50% of the ETF and mutual fund universe is now passive (i.e., indexed). The late, very great, Jack Bogle, the founder of the first index fund, warned that should this happen the core thesis of passive investing would be called into question. When one considers how much additional capital is managed on a “closet-index” basis, as well as the overwhelming majority of new flows into equity funds that go into passive investing, this phenomenon is even more worrisome. The reality is that thinking investors are currently a highly endangered species in the investment world. Accordingly, it’s likely to be a much more volatile and dangerous environment for investors on this side of the Rubicon.
“If investing is entertaining, if you’re having fun, you’re probably not making any money. Good investing is boring.” -George Soros, as relayed in the February 23rd MacroTourist Weekly Round-Up.
My Favorite Style
Champions
What the heck is a style, anyway? When it comes to the stock market, we’ve all repeatedly heard the term “sector”. But styles are a different story; they tend to be rarely discussed, at least by that name. It’s actually odd, because they are much bigger than sectors.
Underlying each style are several sectors, and underneath the S&P there are various styles. You could very loosely say styles are to the S&P 500 as multi-planet solar systems are to a galaxy like the Milky Way. In my analogy, the sectors are the planets and, I guess, running with this a bit more, stocks are the moons that orbit them. However, instead of a few hundred billion stars making up each galaxy, the S&P is composed of nine basic styles. Those are: Large-Cap, Large-Cap Value, Large-Cap Growth, as well as three of the same for Mid-Cap and for Small-Cap. Three times three is, last time I checked, nine.
When it comes to the dollars involved, the Large-Cap S&P styles can put stars to shame with, in some cases, trillions invested in them. These days, the market value heavyweight is, of course, Large-Cap Growth, where the Magnificent Seven are mostly domiciled.
Despite all the attention focused on the Large-Cap style currently, particularly growth, I have long preferred the Mid-Cap cohort. This is because companies that make it to this status are large enough to be resilient, with generally stronger balance sheets and superior business models (i.e. competitive moats) vs Small-Caps. You can see that in the chart below from Kevin Muir, author of, in my view, one of the finest financial publications, The MacroTourist.
Purple Line: Small-Cap Earnings Per Share (EPS); Red Line: Mid-Cap EPS; Gold Line: S&P 500 EPS
You’ll notice that Small-Cap earnings plunged during Covid, came roaring back after that, then took it on the chin again during the 2022/2023 earnings recession. (A side note: as many Haymaker readers can attest, I did often opine I thought a profits recession back then was more likely than an actual economy-wide downturn.) With Mid-Caps it was a much smoother ride, as you can also discern. Frankly, what surprised me is that both have meaningfully exceeded the earnings rise by the S&P 500. The latter, of course, has greatly benefited from the profits eruption by the Magnificent Seven.