Making Hay Monday - August 14th, 2023
High-level macro-market insights, actionable economic forecasts, and plenty of friendly candor to give you a fighting chance in the day's financial fray.
Charts of the Week
#1
It has been one of my core themes that this decade has numerous parallels with the 1970s. Pursuant to that thesis, Schwab’s Chief Investment Strategist, Jeff Kleintop, tweeted this image out recently:
One reason inflation was recurring in the “Disco Decade” is that there were two serious energy crises. We’ve already had one in the 2020s courtesy of Putin’s war of (attempted) conquest in Ukraine. Another could easily be in the offing should Mr. Putin decide to escalate the weaponization of energy. An additional inflationary factor is the Great Green Energy Transition which is both extremely expensive and pushes Western countries toward less reliable power sources. On a happy note, the implausibility of this does seem to be dawning on policymakers who are now warming up to nuclear, the densest form of energy on the planet.
#2
“Underappreciated” is an understatement for the attitude of millions of Americans toward the shale oil and gas miracle of the last 15 years. As discussed in this week’s Making Hay Monday edition, the U.S. has discovered nearly three Saudi Arabias in that timeframe, mostly due to the Permian Basin (primarily oil) and the Marcellus Shale Formation (natural gas). It’s scary to contemplate the quandary the West would be in today if America had followed Europe’s example by banning fracking. What might have happened if ESG mandates had been strictly enforced back in 2008 (when oil hit $140/barrel)?
To learn more about Evergreen Gavekal, where the Haymaker himself serves as Co-CIO, click below.
“ESG investing is fatally flawed.” -Terrence Keeley, former BlackRock senior executive.
—
From Wikipedia:
In political jargon, a useful idiot is a term currently used to reference a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause—particularly a bad cause originating from a devious, ruthless source—without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically being used by the cause's leaders. The term was often used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and psychological manipulation.
Are We All Playing The Fool?
In last Friday’s Haymaker edition, I referred to a front-page New York Times article from August 5th. Candidly, I still can’t believe it was published by that newspaper. It was titled: Rich U.S. Leftist Linked to Web of Global Chinese Propaganda. It would have been much less shocking if it was from The Wall Street Journal or The Washington Post, but coming from the bastion of American left-wing print media was truly startling.
The reason it so resonated with me is that it pertains to one of my core beliefs: the manipulation of Western progressive movements by external actors. To give you a sense of the article, here’s a relevant section on an organization that is heavily funded by an American tech tycoon:
On the surface, No Cold War is a loose collective run mostly by American and British activists who say the West’s rhetoric against China has distracted from issues like climate change and social injustice.
In fact, a New York Times investigation found, it is part of lavishly funded influence campaign that defends China and pushes its propaganda. At the center is a charismatic American millionaire, Neville Roy Singham, who is known as a socialist benefactor of far-left causes.
To characterize Mr. Singham as a Marxist millionaire is a decided understatement. He sold his software company in 2017 for $785 million. Despite hitting the capitalist jackpot, The Times notes he has “long admired Maoism” and “He praised Venezuela under the leftist president Hugo Chavez ‘as a phenomenally democratic place.’”
As we all know, the only thing phenomenal about Venezuela has been its economic collapse, its rigging of elections, and its brutal repression of its own people.
Referring to the network Mr. Singham has built:
They also seek to influence real-world politics by meeting with congressional aides, training politicians in Africa, running candidates in South Africa and organizing protests like the one in London that erupted into violence.
Any guesses if his organization, and others like it, were behind-the-scenes supporters of America’s riots that terrorized our nation in the summer of 2020? Clearly, China has much to gain from fomenting racial hatred and social violence in the U.S. It is naïve to believe it isn’t pursuing that path and the fact that The Times has exposed one of its leading influencers should disabuse everyone of that naïvete.
The article went onto note:
Because the network is built on the back of American nonprofit groups, tax experts said, Mr. Singham may have been eligible for tax deductions for his donations.
One paragraph later, it continued:
None of Mr. Singham’s nonprofits have registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, as is required of groups that seek to influence public opinion on behalf of foreign powers.
The article also points out that:
The Times investigation is the first to unravel the funding and document Mr. Singham’s ties to Chinese propaganda interests.
Please notice that climate change has been a key focus of its “activism”. This has, of course, included the vilification of U.S. oil and gas producers. Unquestionably, it is in both China’s and Russia’s best interest to hobble America’s energy industry, as has happened in Europe. But progressive activists have also been stridently anti-nuclear, despite the environmental benefits of atomic energy. Their intense focus has been on the dangers of reactor meltdowns and the disposal of nuclear waste. Yet, somehow, their protests never extend to China, where nuclear power development is, as we mentioned on Friday, rapidly proliferating. Now we are beginning to see why this is the case…